The Sniper Hit His Mark

March 8th, 2009

In every photo-magazine, every coffee table broadleaf photo book and in every paper back self improvement how to manual there always seems to be from a paragraph to a page of a photographer confessing poetically, waxing eloquently or just babbling on about the beauties of photography and the magic of the process which captures a moment in time and preserves it for ever more. Even I must admit to moments of weakness when I bought into the canned program and driveled on.

waitingwatchingloading4x5_72dpi

One Sunday afternoon as I was contemplating what kind of legacy I would leave behind in my body of writing and photography I discovered, much to my disappointment, I was pretty damned ordinary, unspectacular and yes, even a bit boring.

“That’s a pretty damned awful thought to harbour just one day after you turned 63,” I muttered to myself, flipping through another stack of photos. As usual in my life, when I started a search of this nature, I didn’t find proof of uniqueness, or anything different from the works of 100’s or thousands of other photographers. Those searches seemed to coincide with birthday hallmarks, like 25-years, 30 years, 45 years, fifty years and then 60. And the result of each one was always exactly the same, disappointment, boredom and frustration.

Then, unexpectedly, like the slug from a high velocity sniper rifle planted on a roof top miles away and aimed with deadly accuracy at my head, without the hint of a sound or a telltale muzzle flash my brain exploded with a Buddhist-like enlightenment.

I never found what I was looking for in any of my previous searches because I was looking in the wrong place for the wrong things. For more than 30 years I had succumbed to a false and I suspect phony philosophy.

With the flash of the exploded shrapnel of that sharpshooters’ slug lighting the dark recesses of my brain, I recognized something in myself.  I recognized a limiting factor, a controlling attitude, and an abysmal misconception, which had not only prevented me for finding the quests of my previous searches, but had limited my ability to create, or once created to recognize the essence of my work.

With the revelation I was never who I thought I was and the unbounded excitement of an explorer who had just set foot on uncharted land, or an astronaut leaving mankind’s first footprint in the dust of an alien planet, I had discovered something new. Maybe just new for me, deep in the crevasses of my aging brain, but new and unexplored, none-the-less.

My photography, which until that moment of explosive enlightenment I had always felt to be passive, often unexciting capturing shades of lightness and shadow, colour and texture, always peaceful and well reasoned images in a normally polite package with no offense meant and rarely taken, frequently the politically correct act of semi-creation. In final form and presentation my works and my creative energies had targeted the creation of and prolongation of inoffensive thoughts, deeds and actions.  In other words, they were safe.

That imagined sniper and his mind-manifested projectile had managed to rattle forth the controlling emotions that I believe have held me back and confined both my images and my writing to the sadly ordinary and perceptually mundane.

The choker to my creativity has been fear. It has been fear to let those outside my tightly knit circle of “safe” friends in.  Fear to allow what I create to speak the emotions which drove me to create it. In short, in the period of a mental synapse, a mere nanosecond, the essence of my creative force became instantaneously known to me, without the clouding of doubt or blurring of confusion.

I am driven not by a desire to “make nice” and create pretty things, I live and work to bend the unbendable and to sculpt the unmalleable. My creative energy comes from a realization of how things are, not how they might be and a desire to set them right (in my terms and view of the world).

My energy is neither a product of a class action or a class battle. It is deeply personal. It is hidden so deeply inside me it has taken 63 years of “onion peeling” the layers of my existence to merely see it and the epiphany of blinding insight (triggered by a virtual projectile) to recognize and begin to understand.

The revelation: As a writer, and then again as a photographer I have beendriven by a boundless desire to control what I see around me. At first I used words, then graduated to images and later yet to elements of images to make (force) the world to comply with how I wanted it to be (look). At every opportunity I denied exactly what I worked to create, fearing such outspokenness would make both me and my works somehow less worthy.

The fuel for this drive has been both fear and anger. An intense fear of rejection of my works limited what I attempted to create. Anger and a deep sense of lack of control of all things surrounding me mentally locked me in a windowless cell.

That v1rtual bullet from the imagined sniper’s rifle held by a non-existent assassin on an unidentified building in a nameless town set me free.

Surprisingly, as I look back at images I thought were disappointing, as I allow myself to see inside the bottled emotions and desire for the exercise of control – with this new sense of personal understanding and discovery — I see my art in a new way and shout to all who will listen, “I am free.”

The Odd Thing About Photography

February 8th, 2009

For nearly 40 years I have been involved in photography as a professional communicator supplementing his work with photos, as a photo journalist, a TV camera person and stringer for the major outlet to a national network, an active hobbiest and now, once again, a part time professional photographer.

Merchant or MercenaryPhotography is one of those rare undertakings which is always in flux, always changing, growing, adapting and keeping pace with society and technology all at once. If it isn’t changes in lenses or shutter speeds, then it is changes to the recording medium (film to digital comes rushing to mind).  But, despite the changes in technology, construction and practices one thing remains the same.  No matter how it is captured — with a home made pin-hole camera to a $25,000 or more expensive medium format digital — that one constant is the capturing and saving of an instant in time created by the interplay of light on objects ranging from people to rocks and buildings, battleships and bath tubs, fashion models or car wrecks captured by light and shadow combined creates images seen and captured by the tools photographers use.

For nearly my entire career as active practitioner or avid amateur I had believed photography was merely mechanical, controlled by technologically savvy technicians.  That philosophy has given rise to an often-repeated belief that  “Photography in not Art” and  “Photographers can not be considered Artists.”

After a prolonged period of soul searching I became aware of just how important photography is to me.  I find myself viewing the world in shades of gray or in hues of vivid color.  Great sunrises and sunsets always cause me to pause and enjoy.  When I attend a movie screening, frequently it is the images, more than the plot or script, dialogue or cast of players that leaves the most lasting impression.  The images, the images set the tone; create the feeling and influence the other senses to think, act and feel.

Photography is a unique past time, both mechanically demanding and artistically challenging.  It is the only pursuit I can imagine which allows its practitioners to see with their eyes, sort with their hands, create with their hearts and speak in eloquent muted silence with their images.

Photography is an art.  I am damned proud to consider my photography an art form.  I am prouder yet to describe myself as one who wants to become an artist.

What Equipment to Buy?

February 8th, 2009

There was a time I had a stock answer for the often asked question about what camera and equipment should be bought by a friend or someone I knew who was just getting involved in photography. As my age, the age of those I associated with and our combined experience levels evolved, so did the answers I gave.

When I was young, reckless and seemed to have more dollars than sense my answer was always the same, short retort. “Buy the very best you can afford, then learn how to use it.” I would mutter those words as they or I, or the both of us plunked down our money for the newest, brightest and most expensive equipment we could find.

My rule, in general seemed to be a pretty good one. I was usually happy with the images I captured, as were the friends and acquaintances I had “advised”. Using my rule, I worked myself up to a brace of black-bodied Canon F-1’s resplendent with power winders and a selection of lenses ranging from a 15 mm. “fish eye” to some (at the time) state of the art zoom lenses. They were all Canon lenses. They were all f 2.8 or better and they were all expensive.

Then, as I advanced in my career path in communications, I chanced to meet a Canadian icon of photography. At least he was to the employees of Canadian Pacific Ltd., train buffs around the world, art collectors and the Canadian Government which awarded him the prestigious Order of Canada. His name was Nicholas Morant and he had learned from and worked with the best of the best from the Second World War and beyond. Heck, he even knew Karsh. (I try not to be a name dropper, so I will leave it to you to look up who Nick Morant and Yousef Karsh were).

For some reason, mainly because he was such a nice & gentle man, Nicholas and I became friends. Seeing my eagerness to learn photography he also put forth a lot of gentle encouragement and subtle effort to help me develop a distinctive technique. It was from Nicholas Morant I learned it wasn’t the expensive, newest or shiniest equipment which delivered the best result. It was, rather, the attention to detail at the time of capturing the image and later in the dark room which made the real difference.

From Nicholas Morant I learned it is better to compose and wait for the right moment, the right time of day, all the right natural elements to come together than to blithely “burn film” with my motor drive in the hopes of “getting something good” from the tens of negatives or transparencies which normally resulted from a hit or miss philosophy of photography.

When I first arrived the sky was gray and the light was flat.  I could so some breaks in the cloud out at sea.  I waited for an hour and a half and was rewarded with this image.

When I first arrived the sky was gray and the light was flat. I could so some breaks in the cloud out at sea. I waited for an hour and a half and was rewarded with this image.

Nicholas Morant taught me to take my time, think things through and really work at each image I made. His teachings and gentle guidance stuck and I have retained that philosophy ever sense.

My advise to friends and fellow photographers also changed. Instead of preaching the gospel of “Buy the Best, To Stay Ahead of the Rest” and “spend, spend, spend to capture great images” evolved to a more sedate, thoughtful, and I think mature philosophy of “learn the process, learn how a camera works, learn about composition and lighting and then put it all together, using the equipment you have to capture the image you want.” If you have learned the craft well, you will figure out how to get the image you seek.

I had initially started writing this piece as a brief introduction to how to choose photography equipment. Like my photographic philosophy but in a much more time compressed way, this post took on a life of its own and evolved into a memory, a salute, and in a way a celebration of the 10th Anniversary of Nick Morant’s death (March 17, 1999) . . . a passing which has left the planet a little less wealthy in terms of arts, photography and memorable, gentle and delightful persons.

If you don’t mind, I would like to leave this post as it is and talk about selecting a camera the next time.

Is a cover-up worth it?

December 30th, 2008

Go naked, or use a lens hood; UV Filter or uncovered, seem to be two topics frequently debated by most photographers I know. So, what the heck, I figure I might just as well weigh in on this “burning issue”.

My take on these issues is simple and straight forward – kinda’ like saying I am a Republican, Conservative when it comes to the issue of protecting expensive lenses and lens elements with simple, low cost and effective add-on equipment.

Let’s start with UV filters. The very first item I purchased when I picked up my first single lens reflex camera – a UV FilterPentax Spotmatic – yup, I am really that old, was a UV filter for my 50 mm. standard, 24 mm. wide angle and 135 mm. telephoto. The salesman, who later became a friend, said “If you can afford to buy the camera and equipment, you can’t afford not to buy UV filters.”

He lectured me on the benefits of mildly improved color rendition with the Kodachrome-25 I intended to shoot and got my attention when he suggested a $12 filter could save damage to a $100 lens (Things were much cheaper way back then). I doubted, but I bought.

Not two weeks later, while experimenting with a brand new set of extension tubes for macro photography I got my lens too close to a sharply pointed rock. There was this very unhealthy sounding scratch and the image just didn’t look as clear through the camera. Closer emergency inspection of the front of the lens revealed a cracked UV filter with a scratch right in the center of it. Without the UV filter I would have had to buy a new lens. Needless to say, I have used UV filters ever since (and that is a darned long time).

flair3x4blogsized1About a year later I was looking at some Ektachrome 64 slides shot in the Canadian Rockies near Banff, Alberta. I noticed some strange geometric light spots in the images. I was younger then, so the first thing I thought of was a stray UFO had happened into my image. But my buddy, (remember the guy who sold me the camera?) quickly dashed my illusions of the mysterious by identify the “lights” as lens flare. The flare, he told me was caused by reflection of sunlight into the lens elements.

He also said I shouldn’t worry, “‘cause flare was a really popular special effect” – they had really strange tastes in the 70’s – but, if I didn’t like it, all I had to do was buy a lens hood. He closed his sale by reminding me about how right he had been to suggest the UV filter and beyond just eliminating the flare, I would be adding yet more protection to my expensive lenses. The real closer, though, — I was single at the time – was “the female of the species” really thought cameras with lens hoods were cool.

Well, now I have been married a couple of times and learned not to deliberately create flare, but, I can’t help but think the lens hood really does reduce flare and sure as heck adds extra protection to lenses that now cost several hundreds of dollars or more.

So, to that salesman of long ago, I say thanks, and to anyone reading this piece I strongly vote in favor of using both UV filters and lens hoods. Besides, I am single again, and I think a long lens fitted with a fancy lens hood on an expensive black-bodied camera really does still look cool.

Want more information on lens hoods?

Check out a site by Paul van Warlee at http://www.vanwarlee.com/optics/lenshood.htm/

To learn more about UV Filter use, check out the site named “The Luminous Landscape” at http:/www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-feb-05.shmtl